Skip to main content

How COVID-19 Transformed the Workplace:
Implications for HR and Leadership

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly reshaped the workplace, leaving a lasting imprint on how businesses operate and employees interact. For human resources professionals and business leaders, this transformation has introduced both challenges and opportunities. From the rapid adoption of remote work to redefined employee well-being, the pandemic has restructured organizational norms and priorities.

The Rise of Remote and Hybrid Work Models

One of the most significant shifts has been the widespread adoption of remote work. Before the pandemic, telecommuting was often limited to select roles or industries. COVID-19 accelerated its acceptance across diverse sectors, making remote and hybrid work arrangements a cornerstone of modern business operations. Leaders and HR professionals now face the challenge of maintaining productivity, fostering collaboration, and ensuring team cohesion in virtual environments.

For HR and leadership, the key action item is to develop hybrid work policies that balance flexibility with collaboration. Collecting regular feedback from employees about their remote work experience and investing in technology that facilitates seamless communication should be top priorities.

Prioritization of Employee Well-Being

The pandemic underscored the importance of employee well-being, both physical and mental. Organizations recognized that burnout, isolation, and health anxieties could significantly impact performance and engagement. Forward-thinking organizations responded by expanding mental health resources, offering flexible schedules, and promoting wellness programs. As a next step, HR and business leaders should establish a culture of well-being that includes regular mental health check-ins, employee assistance programs, and benefits tailored to holistic wellness.

Accelerated Digital Transformation

COVID-19 expedited the adoption of digital tools and platforms as companies sought to maintain operations amid lockdowns. From virtual meetings to cloud-based project management, technology became the backbone of many businesses. To stay competitive, HR and leadership teams must embrace ongoing digital training and ensure their workforce has the skills needed for a tech-driven environment. Additionally, exploring tools powered by artificial intelligence can optimize recruiting, onboarding, and performance management.

Inclusion in a Hybrid World

The shift to hybrid work has had unintended consequences for workplace inclusion. Some employees may feel disconnected from decision-making or lack access to resources depending on their work location. Leaders must prioritize inclusivity by fostering equitable access to opportunities and ensuring diverse voices are heard in virtual and in-person settings. Action items include leveraging employee resource groups, hosting inclusivity training, and creating intentional touchpoints for team engagement.

The Rise of Purpose-Driven Work

Employees today are increasingly seeking alignment between their values and those of their employers. The pandemic caused many to reevaluate their priorities, leading to the “Great Resignation” and a renewed focus on purpose. Organizations must articulate their mission and demonstrate genuine commitment to social and environmental responsibility. HR professionals can facilitate this alignment by embedding purpose into talent acquisition, performance reviews, and organizational communication.

A Path Forward

As businesses continue to adapt, the pandemic’s lessons offer valuable insights for shaping the future of work. Organizations that embrace flexibility, invest in employee well-being, and leverage technology effectively are better positioned to thrive in a dynamic landscape. For HR professionals and business leaders, the focus must remain on creating workplaces that are not only productive but also supportive and inclusive. By staying ahead of these trends, organizations can build a resilient workforce prepared for future challenges.

Court Again Rejects Discrimination
Claim for Weight-Loss Drugs

A federal trial court has dismissed another proposed class action lawsuit against an insurer/health plan administrator alleging discrimination under Affordable Care Act (ACA) Section 1557 for failure to cover weight-loss drugs. As in a previous case, the participant alleged that the insurer’s plan violated Section 1557 (which prohibits discrimination in certain health programs and activities based on race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability) by excluding coverage for medications prescribed for weight loss. She claimed that she and the other members of the class were qualified individuals with disabilities, and the plan exclusion amounted to disability discrimination. The insurer argued that the weight-loss exclusion applied to participants regardless of disability status since it applied equally to overweight persons, obese persons who are not disabled, and obese persons who may be disabled.

The court rejected the participant’s allegation that every participant in the plan who had an obesity diagnosis coupled with a prescription for weight-loss drugs was disabled but accepted that she had alleged individual limitations that made her own allegation of disability plausible. However, the court explained that the participant was required to show that she was denied coverage “solely by reason of her disability.” On its face, the plan exclusion did not turn on disability status, impacted participants whether or not they were disabled, and did not isolate disabled participants for discriminatory treatment. Furthermore, the participant did not show that the insurer ever regarded her (or all obese persons) to be disabled. The court, therefore, concluded that the participant’s “bare conclusory” allegations did not support a plausible finding that the insurer’s exclusion for weight-loss drugs amounted to intentional, proxy, disparate impact, or deliberate indifference discrimination.

While the reach of Section 1557 in disputes alleging disability discrimination continues to be sorted out in the courts, plan sponsors and their advisors may take some solace in this court’s finding that the plan’s exclusion of coverage for weight-loss drugs was not alone sufficient to state a plausible claim that the benefit denial was based solely on the presumed presence of a disability.

IRS Announces Contribution Limits, Deductibles,
and Maximums for 2026

The IRS has released the 2026 cost-of-living adjusted limits for health savings accounts (HSAs), high-deductible health plans (HDHPs), and excepted benefit health reimbursement arrangements (EBHRAs). Here are the details:

  • HSA Contribution Limits: The 2026 annual HSA contribution limit is $4,400 for individuals with self-only HDHP coverage (up from $4,300 in 2025) and $8,750 for individuals with family HDHP coverage (up from $8,550 in 2025).
  • HDHP Minimum Deductibles: The 2026 minimum annual deductible is $1,700 for self-only HDHP coverage (up from $1,650 in 2025) and $3,400 for family HDHP coverage (up from $3,300 in 2025).
  • HDHP Out-of-Pocket Maximums: The 2026 limit on out-of-pocket expenses (including items such as deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance, but not premiums) is $8,500 for self-only HDHP coverage (up from $8,300 in 2025) and $17,000 for family HDHP coverage (up from $16,600 in 2025).
  • EBHRA Contribution Limit: The maximum amount that may be made newly available for plan years beginning in 2026 is $2,200 (up from $2,150 in 2025).

The catch-up contribution limit (for HSA-eligible individuals aged 55 or older) is set forth in Code § 223(b)(3) and remains at $1,000. EBHRAs are limited-dollar, nonintegrated HRAs that qualify as excepted benefits. They can be offered by employers of any size and must meet certain requirements.

© 2025 Moreton & Company. This newsletter is intended to inform recipients about industry developments and best practices. It does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or recommendations and is provided for your general information only. If you need legal advice upon which you can rely, you must seek an opinion from your attorney.